Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061550›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2021

Defining the volume of rabies immunoglobulins/ rabies monoclonal antibodies requirement for wound infiltration of category III animal exposures - an exploratory study.

Ravish S Haradanhalli, Nitu Kumari, Mysore K Sudarshan, D H Ashwath Narayana, Ramya M Prashanth, Jithin Surendran

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Post-Marketing Surveillance of the World's First Novel Cocktail of Rabies Monoclonal Antibodies: TwinRab™ in Real \-World Setting.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ravish S HaradanhalliDepartment of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Nitu KumariDepartment of Community Medicine, Bangalore Medical College & Research Institute, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6348-997X
Mysore K SudarshanDepartment of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, India.
D H Ashwath NarayanaDepartment of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, India.
Ramya M PrashanthDepartment of Community Medicine, Sri Siddhartha Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Nelamangala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0324-4241
Jithin SurendranDepartment of Community Medicine, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangalore, India.ORCID 0000-0002-6857-8234
Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences · INBangalore Medical College and Research Institute · INSri Siddhartha Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

WHO recommends infiltration of rabies immunoglobulins/rabies monoclonal antibodies as anatomically possible, into or close to all category III animal bite wound(s)/exposures for post exposure prophylaxis. The volume required for wound infiltration depending upon the site/size/severity of wound is yet to be defined for guiding the treating physicians. This study aimed to determine the volume of rabies immunoglobulin/rabies monoclonal antibody required for wound infiltration depending upon the site, size, and severity. A prospective cohort study was conducted including category III animal exposures at the anti-rabies clinic, KIMS hospital and Research Center, Bangalore, India. The volume of rabies immunoglobulins/rabies monoclonal antibodies required for wound infiltration, depending on site, severity, and size was determined. All the subjects were followed for 6 months to demonstrate the safety and clinical efficacy of post exposure prophylaxis. The present study included 717 subjects having 1428 bite wounds. There was a significant difference in the median volume required for wound infiltration based on site, size, and severity of bite wounds. However, on pairwise comparison; the median volume among all the pairs for only wound size was found to be statistically significant. Supportively, a strong positive correlation was seen with the size of wound and volume infiltrated. The volume of rabies immunoglobulin/rabies monoclonal antibodies required for wound infiltration shall be determined according to size of wounds, i.e. 1 ml for <1 cm wound, 3 ml for 1-5 cm wound, and 5 ml for >5 cm wound.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBites and StingsRabiesRabies VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalHumansImmunoglobulinsIndiaPost-Exposure ProphylaxisProspective StudiesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalImmunoglobulinsRabies Vaccinespost exposure prophylaxisrabies immunoglobulinsrabies monoclonal antibodiesvolumewound infiltration

Identifiers

PMID35061550
PMCPMC8903922
OpenAlexW4207031331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.