Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061231›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2022

Clinical Disease Measures in Generalized Pustular Psoriasis.

A David Burden, Siew Eng Choon, Alice B Gottlieb, Alexander A Navarini, Richard B Warren

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Considerations for defining and diagnosing generalized pustular psoriasis.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

A David BurdenInstitute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7395-9931
Siew Eng ChoonHospital Sultanah Aminah Johor Bahru, Clinical School Johor Bahru, Monash University Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-5746
Alice B GottliebIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2927-8618
Alexander A NavariniDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7059-632X
Richard B WarrenDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, M6 8HD, UK. Richard.Warren@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2918-6481
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBSultanah Aminah Hospital · MYUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare neutrophilic skin condition characterized by episodes of widespread eruption of sterile macroscopic pustules that can be associated with systemic inflammation. The rarity of GPP and its heterogeneous cutaneous and extracutaneous symptoms pose considerable challenges to the development and adoption of comprehensive accurate disease measures for the routine clinical assessment of disease severity and the evaluation of new treatments in clinical trials. Psoriasis disease measures remain among the most commonly used methods for evaluating patients with GPP, despite their limitations owing to a lack of assessment of pustules (a hallmark of GPP), systemic inflammation, and disease symptoms. The adaptation of psoriasis disease measures and the development of assessment tools specific for GPP severity will enable more effective and accurate monitoring of patients with GPP and enhance the clinical development of new therapies. Further clinical validation of recently developed modified assessment tools, such as the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment and the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and international consensus on using quantitative tools and patient-reported outcome measures in the development of new treatments are needed to advance patient care.

Indexed as

HumansPsoriasisSeverity of Illness IndexSkin Diseases, Vesiculobullous

Identifiers

PMID35061231
PMCPMC8801406
OpenAlexW4205532092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.