ArticleNeuroinformatics2022
Is Neuroscience FAIR? A Call for Collaborative Standardisation of Neuroscience Data.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- ABCD-ReproNim: An educational program for responsible and reproducible analyses of ABCD data.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Using, misusing, and improving online machine learning-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging published data: A perspective on NeuroQuery.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Datagraphy: toward a systematic approach to dataset discovery.GigaScience · 2025Article
- A Community Effort to Develop Common Data Elements for Pre-Clinical Spinal Cord Injury Research.Neurotrauma reports · 2025Review
- From lab to life: challenges and perspectives of fNIRS for haemodynamic-based neurofeedback in real-world environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- The BRAIN Initiative data-sharing ecosystem: Characteristics, challenges, benefits, and opportunities.eLife · 2024Article
- Reporting checklists in neuroimaging: promoting transparency, replicability, and reproducibility.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Data Management in Biobanking: Strategies, Challenges, and Future Directions.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024Review
- Accelerating the continuous community sharing of digital neuromorphology data.FASEB bioAdvances · 2024Article
- Automating literature screening and curation with applications to computational neuroscience.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Neurodesk: an accessible, flexible and portable data analysis environment for reproducible neuroimaging.Nature methods · 2024Article
- ezBIDS: Guided standardization of neuroimaging data interoperable with major data archives and platforms.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Standardizing digital biobanks: integrating imaging, genomic, and clinical data for precision medicine.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Review
- The future of data analysis is now: Integrating generative AI in neuroimaging methods development.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Benefits of sharing neurophysiology data from the BRAIN Initiative Research Opportunities in Humans Consortium.Neuron · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of neuroscience publications quantifies the impact of data sharing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Ethics Along the Continuum of Research Involving Persons with Disorders of Consciousness.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for starting FAIR discussions in your community.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Online conversion of reconstructed neural morphologies into standardized SWC format.Nature communications · 2023Article
- A guide to the BRAIN Initiative Cell Census Network data ecosystem.PLoS biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this perspective article, we consider the critical issue of data and other research object standardisation and, specifically, how international collaboration, and organizations such as the International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility (INCF) can encourage that emerging neuroscience data be Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). As neuroscientists engaged in the sharing and integration of multi-modal and multiscale data, we see the current insufficiency of standards as a major impediment in the Interoperability and Reusability of research results. We call for increased international collaborative standardisation of neuroscience data to foster integration and efficient reuse of research objects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.