ReviewCurrent oncology reports2022
Pitfalls and Successes in Trials in Older Transplant Patients with Hematologic Malignancies.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Romiplostim versus Recombinant human thrombopoietin in umbilical cord blood transplantation: a single-center retrospective study.Annals of hematology · 2025Trial
- Reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen with low dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide and low-dose anti-thymocyte globulin as graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis for haploidentical stem cell transplantation in older patients.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Ageing on the impact of distribution about preformed anti-HLA and anti-MICA antibody specificities in recipients prior to initial HSCT from East China.Immunity & ageing : I & A · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewRecent medical advances have allowed a greater number of older patients to undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and participate in HSCT trials. In this review, we outline recent advances in HSCT that have made this possible, general setbacks, and their effects on the landscape of HSCT trials in older adults. RECENT
findingsReduced-intensity conditioning regimens and a more physiological approach to transplant candidate selection have given older patients an opportunity to participate in HSCT trials. However, difficulties in allogeneic donor selection, post-transplant complications, and the misalignment of trial goals with patient goals may pose challenges for future trial recruitment and success. While increasing amounts of evidence show that older adults may benefit from participation in HSCT trials, clinicians, investigators, and patients must carefully weigh the benefits with potential repercussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.