Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061169›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2022

Measuring and evaluating standardization of scrub nurse instrument table setups: a multi-center study.

Bernhard Glaser, Tobias Schellenberg, Juliane Neumann, Mathias Hofer, Susanne Modemann, Patrick Dubach, Thomas Neumuth

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bernhard GlaserInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. bernhard.glaser@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-4031
Tobias SchellenbergInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Juliane NeumannInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Mathias HoferENT Department, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
Susanne ModemannAcqua Klinik, Leipzig, Germany.
Patrick DubachInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Thomas NeumuthInnovation Center Computer Assisted Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DEAcqua Klinik · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DEUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

sächsisches staatsministerium für wissenschaft und kunst 03Z1LN12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn-depth knowledge about surgical processes is a crucial prerequisite for future systems in operating rooms and the advancement of standards and patient safety in surgery. A holistic approach is required, but research in the field of surgical instrument tables, standardized instrument setups and involved personnel, such as nurses, is sparse in general. The goal of this study is to evaluate whether there is an existing standard within clinics for an instrument table setup. We also evaluate to which extent it is known to the personnel and whether it is accepted. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study makes use of the Nosco Trainer, a scrub nurse training and simulation system developed to analyze various aspects of the workplace of scrub nurses. The system contains a virtual instrument table, which is used to perform and record instrument table setups. We introduce a metric which delivers a measurable score for the similarity of surgical instrument table setups. The study is complemented with a questionnaire covering related aspects.

resultsFifteen scrub nurses of the Otolaryngology departments at three clinics in Germany and Switzerland performed a table setup for a Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery intervention and completed the questionnaire. The analysis of the developed metric with a leave one out cross-validation correctly allocated 14 of the 15 participants to their clinic. DISCUSSION: In contrast to the identified similarities of table setups within clinics with the collected data, only a third of the participants confirmed in the questionnaire that there is an existing table setup standard for Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery interventions in their facility, but almost three quarters would support a written standard and acknowledge its possible benefits for trainees and new entrants in the operating room.

conclusionsThe structured analysis of the surgical instrument table using a data-driven metric for comparison is a novel approach to gain deeper knowledge about intra-operative processes. The insights can contribute to patient safety by improving the workflow between surgeon and scrub nurse and also open the way for goal-oriented standardization.

Indexed as

OtolaryngologySurgeonsComputer SimulationHumansOperating RoomsReference StandardsComputer-assisted surgeryIntra-operative monitoringNurse trainingStandardizationSurgical process modelWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID35061169
PMCPMC8873066
OpenAlexW4206832237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.