Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061142›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2022

Evaluation of admission levels of P, E and L selectins as predictors for thrombosis in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Mona M Watany, Saied Abdou, Reham Elkolaly, Nashwa Elgharbawy, Hossam Hodeib

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endotheliopathy in Acute COVID-19 and Long COVID.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Biomedicines · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mona M WatanyClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Medical Campus, El Giesh st., Tanta, El-Gharbia Governorate, Tanta, 31527, Egypt. mona.watany@med.tanta.edu.eg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9525-1317
Saied AbdouClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Medical Campus, El Giesh st., Tanta, El-Gharbia Governorate, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.
Reham ElkolalyChest department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Nashwa ElgharbawyInternal Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Hossam HodeibClinical Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Medical Campus, El Giesh st., Tanta, El-Gharbia Governorate, Tanta, 31527, Egypt.
Tanta University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thromboembolic complications are the most reported cause of death in coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Hypercoagulability, platelets activation and endotheliopathy are well-recognized features in COVID-19 patients. The aim of this work was to evaluate circulating soluble selectins P, E and L at the time of hospital admission as predictors for upcoming thrombosis. This retrospective study included 103 hospitalized COVID-19 patients and 50 healthy volunteer controls. COVID-19 patients were categorized into two groups; group 1 who developed thrombosis during hospitalization and group 2 who did not. Soluble selectins were quantitated using ELISA technique. Higher levels of sP-selectin, sE-selectin and sL-selectin were detected in COVID-19 patients compared to controls. Furthermore, significantly higher levels were found in group 1 compared to group 2. Their means were [5.86 ± 1.72 ng/mL vs. 2.51 ± 0.81 ng/mL]; [50 ± 8.57 ng/mL vs. 23.96 ± 6.31 ng/mL] and [4.66 ± 0.83 ng/mL vs. 2.95 ± 0.66 ng/mL] for sP-selectin, sE-selectin and sL-selectin respectively. The elevated selectins correlated with the currently used laboratory biomarkers of disease severity. After adjustment of other factors, sP-selectin, sE-selectin and sL-selectin were independent predictors for thrombosis. At sP-selectin ≥ 3.2 ng/mL, sE-selectin ≥ 32.5 ng/mL and sL-selectin ≥ 3.6 ng/mL thrombosis could be predicted with 97.1%, 97.6% and 96.5% sensitivity. A panel of the three selectins provided 100% clinical sensitivity. Admission levels of circulating soluble selectins P, E and L can predict thrombosis in COVID-19 patients and could be used to identify patients who need prophylactic anticoagulants. E-selectin showed a superior clinical performance, as thrombo-inflammation biomarker, to the most commonly studied P-selectin.

Indexed as

COVID-19ThrombosisAnticoagulantsBiomarkersE-SelectinHospitalizationHumansL-SelectinP-SelectinRetrospective StudiesSelectinsAnticoagulantsBiomarkersE-SelectinL-SelectinP-SelectinSelectinsCoagulopathy, P-selectin (CD62P)COVID-19E-selectin (CD62E)L-selectin (CD62L)SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35061142
PMCPMC8778493
OpenAlexW4206611169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.