Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35061105›Full record

ReviewArchives of microbiology2022

Microbial CO

Sachin Kajla, Ritu Kumari, Gurpreet Kaur Nagi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. COApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Production of succinate with two COMicrobial cell factories · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Perspectives for Using COBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Will tomorrow's mineral materials be grown?Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  15. Prospects for engineeringEngineering microbiology · 2023
    Review
  16. Porous Polymer Materials for COMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sachin KajlaEnvironmental Research Group, R&D and Scientific Services Department, Tata Steel Limited, Jamshedpur, 831007, India. sachin.kajla@tatasteel.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6804-1584
Ritu Kumari *Environmental Research Group, R&D and Scientific Services Department, Tata Steel Limited, Jamshedpur, 831007, India.
Gurpreet Kaur Nagi *Environmental Research Group, R&D and Scientific Services Department, Tata Steel Limited, Jamshedpur, 831007, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid acceleration in emissions of inevitably generated CO

Indexed as

BiotechnologyCarbon DioxideBiofuelsCarbonFermentationBiofuelsCarbonCarbon DioxideBiofuelsCO2 fixing microorganismsCO2 sequestrationGenetic engineering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.