ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022
Would they do it again? Final treatment decisions in malignant brain tumour patients-a caregiver's perspective.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Social relationships and relational pain in brain tumor patients and their partners.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOverall survival of malignant brain tumour patients has significantly been increased over the last years. However, therapy remains palliative, and side effects should be balanced. Once terminal phase is entered, both patients and caregivers may find it hard to accept, and further therapies are demanded. But little is known about this highly sensitive period. Therefore, we analysed the last therapy decisions from the family caregiver's perspective. Would they support their beloved ones in the same way or would they now recommend a different therapy decision?
methodsCaregivers of deceased malignant brain tumour patients, treated at our neurooncological centre between 2011 and 2017, were included. We designed a questionnaire to analyse the impact of the last therapy decision (resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy), focusing on probable repeat of the choice taken and general therapy satisfaction. Independent variables, for example "satisfaction with therapy", were analysed using linear regression analysis, the coefficient of determination R
resultsData from 102 caregivers (life partners (70.6%)) were analysed retrospectively. Each 40% of patients died in a hospice or at home (20% in a hospital). In 67.6% the last therapy was chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy (16.7%) and surgery (15.7%). A positive evaluation of the last therapy was significantly correlated to re-choosing of respective therapy (chemo-/radiotherapy: p = 0.000) and satisfaction with informed consent (p = 0.000). Satisfaction regarding interpersonal contact was significantly correlated to satisfaction with resection (p = 0.000) and chemotherapy (p = 0.000 27 caregivers (28.7%) felt overburdened with this situation).
conclusionThis analysis demonstrates a significant correlation between a positive relation of patient/caregiver/physician and the subjective perception of the latest therapy. It underlines the central role of caregivers, who should be involved in therapy discussions. Neurooncologists should be specially trained in communication and psycho-oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.