Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35060845›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2022

Psychometric properties of a brief, self-report measure of social inclusion: the F-SIM16.

Kate Filia, Caroline X Gao, Henry J Jackson, Jana Menssink, Amity Watson, Andrew Gardner, Sue M Cotton, Eóin Killackey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The changing impacts of social determinants on youth mental health in Australia.The International journal of social psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kate FiliaOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6581-5890
Caroline X GaoOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0987-2759
Henry J JacksonMelbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Jana MenssinkOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Amity WatsonOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Andrew GardnerOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Sue M CottonOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Eóin KillackeyOrygen, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsA disproportionate number of people with mental ill-health experience social exclusion. Appropriate measurement tools are required to progress opportunities to improve social inclusion. We have developed a novel measure, the Filia Social Inclusion Measure (F-SIM). Here we aimed to present a more concise, easy-to-use form, while retaining its measurement integrity by (i) refining the F-SIM using traditional and contemporary item-reduction techniques; and (ii) testing the psychometric properties of the reduced measure.

methodsFive hundred and six participants completed the F-SIM, younger and older groups of people with serious mental illness (including psychosis, mood, anxiety disorders) and same-aged community counterparts. The F-SIM was completed at baseline and 2-week follow-up, alongside other measures (including social inclusion, loneliness). The F-SIM was refined using multidimensional scaling network analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. The psychometric evaluation included assessment of dimensionality, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, discriminant ability and construct validity.

resultsThe F-SIM was reduced from 135-items to 16; with 4-items in each domain of housing and neighbourhood, finances, employment and education and social participation and relationships. Psychometric properties were sound, including strong internal consistency within domains (all α > 0.85) and excellent overall (α = 0.92). Test-retest reliability was also high (γ = 0.90). Differences between groups were observed; clinical subgroups consistently reported lower levels of social inclusion compared to community counterparts.

conclusionsThe F-SIM16 is a sound, reliable, brief self-report measure of social inclusion suitable for use in clinical and research settings. It has the potential to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and aid in fostering targeted and personalised needs-based care.

Indexed as

Anxiety DisordersMental HealthHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnairespsychometricsself reportsocial exclusionSocial inclusionsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35060845
PMCPMC8786614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.