Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35060427›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical biology2022

Folium

Ting Zhu, Bin-Yu Fang, Xiang-Bao Meng, Shu-Xia Zhang, Hong Wang, Ge Gao, Fei Liu, Yu Wu, Jin Hu, Gui-Bo Sun and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Natural Products as Modulators of Nrf2 Signaling Pathway in Neuroprotection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. MethanolicFrontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ting ZhuBeijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Discovery of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Natural Medicine) and Translational Medicine, Beijing, China.
Bin-Yu FangBeijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Discovery of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Natural Medicine) and Translational Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiang-Bao MengBeijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Discovery of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Natural Medicine) and Translational Medicine, Beijing, China.
Shu-Xia ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Discovery of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Natural Medicine) and Translational Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hong WangSihuan Pharmaceutical Holdings Group Ltd, Beijing, China.
Ge GaoSihuan Pharmaceutical Holdings Group Ltd, Beijing, China.
Fei LiuSihuan Pharmaceutical Holdings Group Ltd, Beijing, China.
Yu WuSihuan Pharmaceutical Holdings Group Ltd, Beijing, China.
Jin HuSihuan Pharmaceutical Holdings Group Ltd, Beijing, China.
Gui-Bo SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Discovery of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Natural Medicine) and Translational Medicine, Beijing, China.
Xiao-Bo SunBeijing Key Laboratory of Innovative Drug Discovery of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Natural Medicine) and Translational Medicine, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNSihuanPharm (China) · CNHarbin University of Commerce · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFolium

objectiveThis study explores the potential mechanisms of Xingxiong injection MATERIALS AND

methodsSprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly assigned to five groups: the sham (normal saline), the model (normal saline) and the Xingxiong injection groups (12.5, 25 or 50 mL/kg). The rats were subjected to 2 h of middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) followed by reperfusion for 14 d. Xingxiong injection was administered via intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection immediately after ischaemia induction for 14 d. Afterwards, rats were sacrificed at 14 d induced by administration of Xingxiong injection.

resultsXingxiong injection significantly reduces infarct volume (23%) and neurological deficit scores (93%) compared with the MCAO/R group. Additionally, Xingxiong injection inhibits the loss in mitochondrial membrane potential (43%) and reduces caspase-3 level (44%), decreases NOX (41%), protein carbonyl (29%), 4-HNE (40%) and 8-OhdG (41%) levels, inhibits the expression of inflammatory factors, such as TNF-α (26%), IL-1β (34%), IL-6 (39%), MCP-1 (36%), CD11a (41%) and ICAM-1 (43%). Moreover, Xingxiong injection can increase p-Akt/Akt (35%) and Nrf2 (47%) protein expression and inhibit NLRP3 (42%) protein expression.

conclusionsXingxiong injection prevents cerebral ischaemia/reperfusion injury via activating the Akt/Nrf2 pathway and inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome. These findings provide experimental evidence for clinical use of drugs in the treatment of ischaemic stroke.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrugs, Chinese HerbalGinkgo bilobaInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryInflammasomesIschemic StrokeMaleNF-E2-Related Factor 2NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 ProteinProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPyrazinesRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyDrugs, Chinese HerbalInflammasomesNfe2l2 protein, ratNF-E2-Related Factor 2NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 ProteinNlrp3 protein, ratProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPyrazinestetramethylpyrazineapoptosisinflammationIschaemic strokeoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID35060427
PMCPMC8786246
OpenAlexW4206305430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.