Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35060426›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2022

Drastic decline in sera neutralization against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant in Wuhan COVID-19 convalescents.

Chengbao Ma, Xianying Chen, Fanghua Mei, Qing Xiong, Qianyun Liu, Lianghui Dong, Chen Liu, Wenjing Zou, Faxian Zhan, Bing Hu and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Omicron variant wave: Where are we now and what are the prospects?Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Chengbao MaState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Xianying ChenState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Fanghua MeiHubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Qing XiongState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Qianyun LiuState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-9179-4867
Lianghui DongState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Chen LiuState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Wenjing ZouHubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Faxian ZhanHubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Bing HuHubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Yingle LiuState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Fang LiuState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Li ZhouState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6736-0057
Junqiang XuHubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Yongzhong JiangHubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Ke XuState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Kun CaiHubei Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Yu ChenState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-1300-4652
Huan YanState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8744-8665
Ke LanState Key Laboratory of Virology, Institute for Vaccine Research and Modern Virology Research Center, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0384-8598

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global concern has been raised by the emergence and rapid transmission of the heavily mutated SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant (B.1.1.529). So far, the infection features and immune escape ability of the Omicron variant have not been extensively studied. Here, we produced the Omicron pseudovirus and compared its entry, membrane fusion, and immune escape efficiency with the original strain and the dominating Delta variant. We found the Omicron variant showed slightly higher infectivity than the Delta variant and a similar ability to compete with the Delta variant in using Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in a BHK21-ACE2 cell line. However, the Omicron showed a significantly reduced fusogenicity than the original strain and the Delta variant in both BHK21-ACE2 and Vero-E6 cells. The neutralization assay testing the Wuhan convalescents' sera one-year post-infection showed a more dramatic reduction (10.15 fold) of neutralization against the Omicron variant than the Delta variant (1.79 fold) compared with the original strain with D614G. Notably, immune-boosting through three vaccine shots significantly improved the convalescents' immunity against the Omicron variants. Our results reveal a reduced fusogenicity and a striking immune escape ability of the Omicron variant, highlighting the importance of booster shots against the challenge of the SARS-CoV-2 antigenic drift.

Indexed as

Antigenic Drift and ShiftCOVID-19AnimalsChlorocebus aethiopsHumansImmune EvasionImmunization, SecondarySARS-CoV-2Vero CellsDelta variantfusionimmune escapeOmicron variantSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35060426
PMCPMC8856021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.