Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35060059›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Solar distillation meets the real world: a review of solar stills purifying real wastewater and seawater.

Thirugnanasambantham Arunkumar, Ravishankar Sathyamurthy, David Denkenberger, Sang Joon Lee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thirugnanasambantham ArunkumarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, 37673, South Korea.
Ravishankar SathyamurthyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, KPR Institute of Engineering and Technology, Arasur, , Coimbatore, 641407, Tamil Nadu, India.
David DenkenbergerMechanical Engineering and the Alaska Center for Energy and Power, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska, USA.
Sang Joon LeeDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, 37673, South Korea. sjlee@postech.ac.kr.
Pohang University of Science and Technology · KRKPR Institute of Engineering and Technology · INUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks · US

Funding

National Research Foundation No. 2017R1A2B3005415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solar energy-driven evaporation-based freshwater production is one of the sustainable ways to purify contaminated/salty water. Recent advances in solar absorbers' assemblies, design modifications, and integrations with heating sources improved the rate of freshwater productivity. However, the type of feed water affects the evaporation rate in a solar desalination system (SDS). Many studies used tap water with added contaminants to test the performance of a SDS and studied the water quality improvement. As a typical result, pH, total dissolved solids (TDS), and electrical conductivity (µS/cm) are reduced after solar evaporation. The performance of SDSs for real wastewaters are also important to understand, e.g., the reduction of high organic pollutants after solar evaporation. In this aspect, the main objective of the present work is to review solar distillation of real wastewaters and seawater by using SDSs. Further, the mechanism of a solar distiller with heat transfer principles, parameters affecting evaporation process, real wastewaters and seawaters purified in a solar distillation system, improvement of various parameters before and after solar evaporation, pathways of handling wastewaters, challenges, and future perspectives are discussed. Conclusively, SDSs are found to remove pollutants effectively after solar evaporation. The evaporation rate is relatively slower due to high concentration of pollutants that reduce vapor pressure. The COD removal of various real wastewaters, including sludge, kitchen, textile, palm oil, petroleum, water plant, and municipal wastewaters, was 98.13%, 97.85%, 96.84%, 96.71%, 87.99%, 86.99%, and 85.67%, respectively. The reduction rate of salt concentration in real seawater after evaporation in the solar distiller was 99.99%.

Indexed as

WastewaterWater PurificationDistillationSeawaterSunlightWastewaterDesalinationSeawaterSolar energySolar stillWastewaterWater quality

Identifiers

PMID35060059
OpenAlexW4206402919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.