Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35060027›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2022

Artificial light at night (ALAN) causes variable dose-responses in a sandy beach isopod.

Diego Quintanilla-Ahumada, Pedro A Quijón, Patricio H Manríquez, José Pulgar, Manuel R García-Huidobro, Cristian Miranda, Alfredo Molina, Rodrigo Zuloaga, Cristian Duarte

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Diego Quintanilla-AhumadaPrograma de Doctorado en Medicina de la Conservación, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Pedro A QuijónDepartment of Biology, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada.
Patricio H ManríquezCentro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas (CEAZA), Coquimbo, Chile.
José PulgarDepartamento de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Manuel R García-HuidobroCentro de Investigación e Innovación para el Cambio Climático, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Santo Tomás, Ejército 146, Santiago, Chile.
Cristian MirandaPrograma de Doctorado en Medicina de la Conservación, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
Alfredo MolinaLaboratorio de Biotecnología Molecular, Universidad Andres Bello, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, 8370146, Santiago, Chile.
Rodrigo ZuloagaLaboratorio de Biotecnología Molecular, Universidad Andres Bello, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, 8370146, Santiago, Chile.
Cristian DuarteDepartamento de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile. cristian.duarte@unab.cl.

Funding

Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico 1200794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial Light at Night (ALAN) is expanding worldwide, and the study of its influence remains limited mainly to documenting impacts, overlooking the variation in key characteristics of the artificial light such as its intensity. The potential dose-response of fitness-related traits to different light intensities has not been assessed in sandy beach organisms. Hence, this study explored dose-responses to ALAN by exposing the intertidal sandy beach isopod Tylos spinulosus to a range of light intensities at night: 0 (control), 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 lx. We quantified the response of this species at the molecular (RNA:DNA ratios), physiological (absorption efficiency) and organismal (growth rate) levels. Linear and non-linear regressions were used to explore the relationship between light intensity and the isopod response. The regressions showed that increasing light intensity caused an overall ~ threefold decline in RNA:DNA ratios and a ~ threefold increase in absorption efficiency, with strong dose-dependent effects. For both response variables, non-linear regressions also identified likely thresholds at 80 lx (RNA:DNA) and 40 lx (absorption efficiency). By contrast, isopod growth rates were unrelated (unaltered) by the increase in light intensity at night. We suggest that ALAN is detrimental for the condition of the isopods, likely by reducing the activity and feeding of these nocturnal organisms, and that the isopods compensate this by absorbing nutrients more efficiently in order to maintain growth levels.

Indexed as

IsopodaLight PollutionAnimalsCausalityDNARNADNARNAALANDose–responseEcophysiologyMesocosmsSandy beach systemsTylos spinulosus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.