ArticleObesity surgery2022
Bypassing Different Parts of the Small Intestine Determines Different Metabolic Effects in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Rats.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSide-to-side jejunoileal bypass with proximal loop ligation (SSJIBL) has significant glucose-lowering and weight-control effects; however, no study has elucidated which segment is most effective in SSJIBL. This study investigated the effect of proximal small intestinal bypass (PSIB), middle small intestinal bypass (MSIB), and distal small intestinal bypass (DSIB) on metabolic improvement in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. MATERIALS AND
methodsSTZ-induced diabetic rats were divided into four groups: PSIB, MSIB, DSIB, and sham-operated. The primary outcome measures were body weight, food intake, fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels, oral glucose tolerance (OGTT), insulin tolerance (ITT), serum insulin, gut hormones, serum lipid profile, and liver function levels.
resultsGlobal body weight in the DSIB group was lower than that in the PSIB group. The global food intake in the PSIB group was lower than that in the MSIB group. The PSIB group had a slightly better glucose-lowering effect than the MSIB and DSIB groups. The PSIB, MSIB, and DSIB groups all had improvement in insulin sensitivity at postoperative week 6. The MSIB group exhibited the best improvement in lipid homeostasis. Serum insulin and leptin levels were higher, and serum ghrelin levels were lower in the operated groups than in the sham group.
conclusionsThis study provides experimental evidence that PSIB surgery induces a better glucose-lowering effect than DSIB surgery, and MSIB induced the best improvement in lipid homeostasis, whereas DSIB was even more advantageous in terms of weight control in the STZ-induced diabetic rat model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.