Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35060003›Full record

ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2022

Getting to 100%: Research Priorities and Unanswered Questions to Inform the US Debate on Universal Health Insurance Coverage.

Peter Cram, Harry Selker, Jennifer Carnahan, Santiago Romero-Brufau, Michael A Fischer, SGIM Health Policy Research Committee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peter CramDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical Branch, University of Texas, 301 University Blvd, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA. pecram@utmb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1910-346X
Harry SelkerInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer CarnahanIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Santiago Romero-BrufauDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael A FischerDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
SGIM Health Policy Research Committee

Funding

The Coming Home After Rehabilitation and Transition from a Skilled nursing facility with Dementia Study (The CHARTS-D Study)K23AG062797 · NIA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI CARNAHAN, JENNIFER LYNN · 2020 to 2024
$902k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG062797NIA NIH HHS K23AG062797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A majority of Americans favor universal health insurance, but there is uncertainty over how best to achieve this goal. Whatever the insurance design that is implemented, additional details that must be considered include breadth of services covered, restrictions and limits on volumes of services, cost-sharing for individuals, and pricing. In the hopes that research can inform this ongoing debate, we review evidence supporting different models for achieving universal coverage in the US and identify areas where additional research and stakeholder input is needed. Key areas in need of further research include how care should be organized, how costs can be reduced, and what healthcare services universal insurance should cover.

Indexed as

Health ServicesUniversal Health InsuranceHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance, HealthResearch

Identifiers

PMID35060003
PMCPMC8904700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.