ReviewCurrent oncology reports2022
The Emerging Role of Next-Generation Imaging in Prostate Cancer.
Review in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET and multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of pretreatment patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.European radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Real-world clinical outcomes of patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy in SEER-Medicare.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Controversies in the use of next-generation imaging for evaluation and treatment decision-making in patients with prostate cancer after biochemical recurrence: views from a Spanish expert panel.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- 2023 FDA TIDES (Peptides and Oligonucleotides) Harvest.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- PSMA PET/CT in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: Myth or Reality?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Flotufolastat F 18: Diagnostic First Approval.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewProstate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men in developed countries and a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Effective methods for diagnosing and staging PCa are necessary to guide treatment options in a personalized manner. The purpose of this paper is to review recent advances in molecular imaging and therapeutics and their expanding role in imaging and treating PCa. RECENT
findingsCompared with conventional imaging, PSMA PET has proven more accurate at detecting PCa in patients with newly diagnosed PCa or biochemically recurrent PCa. PSMA PET can also induce management changes in patients due to its superior accuracy in detecting metastatic disease. Further research is necessary to understand the appropriate role of PSMA PET in patients with known metastatic PCa and the impact on clinical outcomes in patients who undergo treatment planning using findings from PSMA PET. We review the role of molecular imaging in primary and biochemically recurrent PCa. We find that molecular imaging is effective in detecting PCa and may lead to management changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35059998What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.