SynthesisJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2022
The effect of intervention versus watchful waiting on disease progression and overall survival in smoldering multiple myeloma: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smoldering multiple myeloma: advances in diagnosis and risk stratification, and evolving therapeutic strategies.International journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Interventions for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: An Umbrella Review.Journal of clinical & experimental oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an intermediate pre-malignant condition with individuals having a distinct risk of progression to overt myeloma. The optimal management option has remained controversial due to the heterogeneous nature of the condition in which progression to overt diseases is variable. The question of who, when, and what to use for the treatment of SMM remains equivocal. We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and summarized the current evidence supporting the best approach to the management of SMM.
methodsA comprehensive literature search of Medline/PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Wiley Cochrane Library, CINAHL, clinicaltrial.gov, and conference proceedings of ASCO, ASH, EHA, and ESMO was performed on October 25, 2020. Synthesis of the result was done using narrative analysis.
resultOf the total 1560 identified records, 10 eligible studies involving 1157 patients made up of 580 in the intervention group and 577 in the control group were included in this review. Three early trials of melphalan and prednisone fail to demonstrate any significant impact on disease progression with major toxicities reported. Three trials on bisphosphonate monotherapy show reduced skeletal-related events without any clinical effect on disease progression. Lenalidomide monotherapy or as part of a combination therapy demonstrates superiority in delaying disease progression over observation. Only Lenalidomide and dexamethasone combination demonstrated superior overall survival over observation across the trials.
conclusionTrials of lenalidomide in a less intensive approach has shown promise in delaying disease progression and should be investigated further in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.