Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059824›Full record

ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022

Biomechanical analysis of the interval slide procedure: a fresh porcine cadaver study.

Felix Porschke, Marc Schnetzke, Christoph Luecke, Christel Weiss, Stefan Studier-Fischer, Paul Alfred Gruetzner, Thorsten Guehring

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Felix PorschkeBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at Heidelberg University Hospital, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany. felix.porschke@bgu-ludwigshafen.de.
Marc SchnetzkeBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at Heidelberg University Hospital, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Christoph LueckeBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at Heidelberg University Hospital, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Christel WeissDepartment of Medical Statistics, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, University Medicine Mannheim, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Stefan Studier-FischerBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at Heidelberg University Hospital, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Paul Alfred GruetznerBG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen at Heidelberg University Hospital, Ludwig-Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Thorsten GuehringDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Paulinenhilfe, Diakonieklinikum Stuttgart, Rosenbergstraße 38, 70176, Stuttgart, Germany.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DEHeidelberg University · DEDiakonie-Klinikum Stuttgart · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe interval slide procedure (IS) has been introduced to improve mobility in massive, retracted rotator cuff tears. As clinical studies showed controversial results, the benefit of the IS is still widely discussed.

aimAim of this study was to analyze the effect of IS procedure on tendon mobility in a fresh porcine cadaver model. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn 30 fresh porcine cadaver shoulders with artificial supraspinatus defect tendon mobility was tested by measuring the load (in N) during tendon reduction to the footprint at the greater tubercle using a sensor enhanced arthroscopic grasper (t1). In intervention group (N = 15) anterior IS (t2), posterior IS (t3) and intraarticular capsule release (t4) were successively performed, each followed by tendon mobility assessment. Tendon mobility of the control group (N = 15) was measured in same time schedule without intervention.

resultsMobility did not differ between groups for native tendons (CG 28.0 ± 11.2 N vs. IG 26.6 ± 11.6 N; P = 0.75). IS procedure significantly improves mobility at about 25.2% (t1 26.6 ± 11.6 N vs. t4 19.9 ± 12.3 N; P < 0.001) compared to the native tendon and 34.1% compared to CG (CG 30.2 ± 13.7 N vs. 19.9 ± 12.3 N; P = 0.026). In posthoc analyzes, anterior IS (P < 0.001) and capsule release (P = 0.005) significantly increased mobility, whereas the posterior IS did not (P = 0.778).

conclusionThe IS procedure results in increased supraspinatus tendon mobility in fresh porcine cadaver shoulders. However, performing the posterior IS subsequent to the anterior IS no significant improvement of mobility has been observed.

Indexed as

Rotator Cuff InjuriesTendon InjuriesAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCadaverRotator CuffSwineBiomechanicsCapsule releaseMobilityReconstructionRotator cuffTendon

Identifiers

PMID35059824
OpenAlexW4205992056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.