ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2022
Introducing electrolysis to enhance anaerobic digestion resistance to acidification.
Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing the anaerobic sludge characteristics and inorganic impurities removal from synthesis wastewater through integration of electrocoagulation process with up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2025Article
- Polyaniline-Derived Nitrogen-Containing Carbon Nanostructures with Different Morphologies as Anode Modifier in Microbial Fuel Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The phenomenon that the anaerobic system is inhibited by acid has always been a bottleneck hindering the application of anaerobic digestion (AD) technology. We tried to introduce electrolysis into AD to improve the acidification resistance, and eventually the productivity of the energy. In a batch fermentation device, the ability of electrochemical anaerobic digestion (EAD) to resist acidification was evaluated in current intensity, electrode potential, AC impedance, microbial community, pH value, and volatile fatty acids (VFAs). The results showed that the average concentration of VFAs in EAD was 32.9% lower than that in AD, the energy efficiency of EAD is 53.25% higher than AD, indicating that EAD has stronger anti-acidification ability and energy conversion efficiency than AD. When the EAD reaches a steady state, the current intensity fluctuates in the range of 7-12 mA, the electrode potential difference is maintained at 600 ± 5 mV, and the internal resistance decreases from 3333.3 ± 16Ω at startup to 68.9 ± 1.4Ω at the steady state, indicating that the EAD has stronger resistance to acidification may be due to the degradation of some VFAs on the electrode surface. Furthermore, the 16S rRNA sequencing analysis showed that the dominant electricity-producing bacteria on EAD anode surface were Clostridium, Hydrogenophaga and Trichloromonas, with a relative abundance of 40.32%, while the relative abundance of electrogenic bacteria in AD bulk solution and EAD bulk solution were about 1/2 and 1/4 that of EAD anode film, suggesting that the electricity-producing bacteria on the electrode surface play an important role in the degradation of VFAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.