Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059805›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2022

Comparison of zero echo time MRI with T1-weighted fast spin echo for the recognition of sacroiliac joint structural lesions using CT as the reference standard.

Yitong Li, Yan Xiong, Bowen Hou, Chanyuan Liu, Jingyi Wang, Weiyin Vivian Liu, Xiaoming Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yitong LiDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Yan XiongDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Bowen HouDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Chanyuan LiuDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Jingyi WangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China.
Weiyin Vivian Liu *MR Research, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China. weiyin.liu@qq.com.
Xiaoming Li *Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. lilyboston2002@sina.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0545-6782
Tongji Hospital · CNGeneral Electric (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of zero echo time (ZTE) MRI in the depiction of structural lesions of sacroiliac joints (SIJs) in patients with the suspicion of sacroiliitis compared with T1-weighted fast spin echo (T1 FSE), using CT as the reference standard.

methodsForty patients with suspicion of sacroiliitis underwent both CT and MR scans of SIJs with 80 SIJs (160 bone articular surfaces) included for analysis. Two readers independently scored SIJs for structural lesions on CT and MR images. The diagnostic capability of ZTE MRI and T1 FSE were compared by the McNemar test, using CT as the reference standard. Agreements of diagnosis and sum scores of lesions between MR sequences and CT as well as between readers were also investigated using Cohen's κappa tests and intraclass correlation coefficients.

resultsDiagnostic accuracy of ZTE MRI was higher than that of T1 FSE for erosions, sclerosis, and joint space changes (e.g., joint space changes: 91.3% vs 75.0%). ZTE MRI also improved sensitivity for detection of erosions and sclerosis (e.g., erosions at the joint level: 98.2% vs 80.0%) as well as specificity for detection of joint space changes (93.0% vs 67.4%). ZTE MRI had more consistency with CT than T1 FSE for both diagnosis and sum scores. Inter-reader agreements were higher for CT and ZTE MRI than those for T1 FSE.

conclusionsZTE MRI showed superior diagnostic performance in the depiction of SIJ structural lesions compared with routine T1-weighted MRI and had reliability comparable to CT. KEY POINTS: • ZTE MRI can provide CT-like bone contrast for the depiction of osseous structural lesions of the sacroiliac joints. • ZTE MRI showed superior diagnostic performance than conventional T1 FSE in the detection of osseous structural lesions of sacroiliitis, using CT as the reference standard. • In terms of inter-reader reliability, ZTE MRI performed comparably to CT and better than conventional T1 FSE.

Indexed as

Sacroiliac JointSacroiliitisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsSclerosisSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedMagnetic resonance imagingSacroiliac jointSacroiliitisTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID35059805
OpenAlexW4205510028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.