Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059768›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2022

[Innovations in the pharmaceutical treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus].

Johanna Mucke, Matthias Schneider

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Johanna MuckePoliklinik, Funktionsbereich und Hiller Forschungszentrum für Rheumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. johanna.mucke@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Matthias SchneiderPoliklinik, Funktionsbereich und Hiller Forschungszentrum für Rheumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous disease with a complex pathogenesis. Until now, the choice of therapeutic agents has been limited.

objectiveThis review revisits known forms of treatment for SLE and introduces new recently approved agents and agents currently under investigation in clinical trials. The aim of this article is to map the current data from phase 2 and phase 3 studies and European recommendations for the management of SLE and to provide an outlook on the future of lupus treatment. DATA SITUATION: As the focus of SLE treatment is on the achievement of remission with low steroid dosages, early and effective immunosuppressive therapy is essential. With the interferon type I receptor antagonist anifroluma, a treatment for extrarenal lupus has been approved for the first time since 2011. For lupus nephritis, the well-known belimumab (approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA and the European Medicines Agency, EMA) and the calcineurin inhibitor voclosporin (FDA) are newly available. In addition, a large number of substances are currently undergoing clinical trials, e.g. the CD-20 inhibitor obinutuzumab, Janus kinase inhibitors and low-dose interleukin‑2.

conclusionNew and innovative treatment concepts are finding their way into lupus treatment and other promising substances are in the pipeline; however, only long-term data will show to what extent these improve the long-term outcome of patients. Nevertheless, these are important and much needed advances in the treatment of SLE.

Indexed as

Lupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisFemaleHumansMalePharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsAntibodies, monoclonalB‑cell activating factorImmunomodulationInterferon inhibitionReceptor, interferon alpha-beta

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.