Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059591›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2022

The Importance of Superb Microvascular Imaging for the Differentiation of Malignant Breast Lesions from Benign Lesions.

Fatma Zeynep Arslan, Ayşegül Altunkeser, Muslu Kazım Körez, Nergis Aksoy, Zeynep Bayramoğlu, Mehmet Karagülle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Evaluation of Superb Microvascular Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Masses.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatma Zeynep ArslanDepartment of Radiology, Basaksehir City Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6506-2577
Ayşegül AltunkeserDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7412-6835
Muslu Kazım KörezDepartment of Biostatistics, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9524-6115
Nergis AksoyDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-5190
Zeynep BayramoğluDepartment of Pathology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7075-8819
Mehmet KaragülleDepartment of Radiology, University of Health Sciences Turkey, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this prospective study, the diagnostic performance of the new version of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in differentiating malignant from benign lesions was evaluated. MATERIAL AND

methodsNinety breast lesions were included. During color SMI examination, both free-hand region of interest (ROI) and box ROI were used. Vascular index (VI) values were obtained from the lesion using both types of ROI and from normal breast tissue via box ROI. VI values, monochrome SMI grading and histopathological results were compared. The efficacy of color SMI and monochrome SMI was investigated in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions.

resultsThe cut-off value, in the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions with color SMI was 0.50 for box ROI, while it was 0.30 for free-hand ROI. The specificity of VI values obtained with box ROI was higher than that of free-hand ROI when differentiating malignant lesions from benign. Comparison of VI values from a lesion and from normal breast tissue showed that VI values in malignant lesions were significantly higher (p<0.05). The VI values of benign lesions and VI values of normal breast tissue were similar. There was a statistically significant relationship between monochrome SMI grading and the malignancy or benign status of the lesion (p<0.001).

conclusionDrawing the lesion circumference free-hand using a free-shape ROI did not enhance the sensitivity and specificity. Contrary to popular belief, a more easy and practical measurement method may be more suitable for SMI examination. It is hoped that this will be one of the earliest studies to assess the clinical performance of the latest version of SMI.

Indexed as

breast lesionsnew versionSuperb microvascular imagingultrasonographywomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID35059591
PMCPMC8734522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.