Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059585›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of breast health2022

De-Escalation of Breast Cancer Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.

Umar Wazir, Kefah Mokbel

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of breast health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Endoscopy‑assisted breast‑conserving treatment: the first Polish review of 30 patients.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2026
    Article
  4. Axillary management in patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a call for de-escalation.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Umar WazirLondon Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8979-692X
Kefah MokbelLondon Breast Institute, Princess Grace Hospital, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7255-7850
Khyber Teaching Hospital · PKThe Princess Grace Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer treatment has seen many advances in recent decades, lessening the morbidity to patients, while improving outcomes. Central to these gains has been the introduction of breast conserving surgery and neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST). There is a considerable interest in further de-escalation of the treatment of breast cancer, which is being studied in several ongoing randomised trials. We aimed to appraise the current literature regarding the various aspects of de-escalation of surgical treatment of breast cancer after NST, and attempt to prognosticate the future course of breast oncotherapy.

Indexed as

Breast cancerde-escalationneo-adjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID35059585
PMCPMC8734515
OpenAlexW4225502746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.