ArticleACS pharmacology & translational science2022
In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Method to Assess Complement C5a Receptor Antagonist Efficacy.
Article in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Tumor Microenvironment: Mechanisms, Immune Regulation, and Implications for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Complement C5a Receptor Signaling Alters Stress Responsiveness and Modulates Microglia Following Chronic Stress Exposure.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024Article
- Complement C5a induces the generation of neutrophil extracellular traps by inhibiting mitochondrial STAT3 to promote the development of arterial thrombosis.Thrombosis journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complement C5a receptor 1 (C5aR1) has been studied as a potential therapeutic target for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, with several drug candidates identified. Understanding the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a drug candidate is a crucial preclinical step that allows for a greater understanding of a compound's in vivo biodistribution and target engagement to assist in clinical dose selection and dosing frequency. However, few in vivo pharmacodynamic methods have been described for C5a inhibitors. In this study, we, therefore, developed a complete in vivo pharmacodynamic assay in mice and applied this method to the peptide-based C5aR1 antagonists PMX53 and JPE-1375. Intravenous administration of recombinant mouse C5a induced rapid neutrophil mobilization and plasma TNF elevation over a 60 min period. By using C5a receptor-deficient mice, we demonstrated that this response was driven primarily through C5aR1. We next identified using this model that both PMX53 and JPE-1375 have similar in vivo working doses that can inhibit C5aR1-mediated neutrophilia and cytokine production in a dose as low as 1 mg/kg following intravenous injection. However, the in vivo active duration for PMX53 lasted for up to 6 h, significantly longer than that for JPE-1375 (<2 h). Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated rapid plasma distribution and elimination of both compounds, although PMX53 had a longer half-life, which allowed for the development of an accurate pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model. Overall, our study developed a robust in vivo pharmacodynamic model for C5aR1 inhibitors in mice that may assist in preclinical translational studies of therapeutic drug candidates targeting C5a and its receptors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.