ArticleRegenerative therapy2022
Superior stemness of a rapidly growing subgroup of isolated human auricular chondrocytes and the potential for use in cartilage regenerative therapy.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Generation of implant-type tissue-engineered cartilage from human embryonic stem cell-derived chondrocytes.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
- Identification of mesenchymal stem cell populations with high osteogenic potential using difference in cell division rate.Regenerative therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn cartilage regenerative medicine, transplanted chondrocytes contain a mixture of populations, that complicates the regeneration of uniform cartilage tissue. Our group previously reported that chondrocytes with higher chondrogenic ability could be enriched by selection of rapidly growing cells. In this study, the detailed properties of rapidly growing chondrocytes were examined and compared to slowly growing cells.
methodsHuman auricular chondrocytes were fluorescently labeled with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) and analyzed using flow cytometry, focusing on division rates as indicated by fluorescence intensity and cell morphology according to the forward scatter and side scatter. Rapid and slow growing cell groups were harvested on days 2 and 4 after CFSE labeling, and their ability to produce cartilage matrix
resultsOn day 2 after CFSE labeling, the rapidly growing cell group showed the highest proliferation rate. The results of pellet culture showed that the rapid cell group produced more glycosaminoglycans per cell than the slow cell group. The amount of glycosaminoglycan production was highest in the rapid cell group on day 2 after CFSE labeling, indicating high chondrogenic ability. Furthermore, microarray, gene ontology, and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analyses showed upregulation of genes that promote cell division such as origin recognition complex subunit 1 and downregulation of genes that inhibit cell division such as cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 1A. Besides cell cycle-related genes, chondrocyte-related genes such as serpin family B member 2, clusterin, bone morphogenetic protein 2, and matrix metalloproteinase 3 were downregulated, while fibroblast growth factor 5 which is involved in stem cell maintenance, and coiled-coil and C2 domain containing 2A, which is required for cilia formation, were upregulated.
conclusionThe results showed that the rapid cell group proliferated well and had more undifferentiated properties, suggesting a higher stemness. The present findings provide a basis for the use of the rapid cell group in cartilage regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.