ArticleIEEE transactions on computational imaging2021
Autoregression and Structured Low-Rank Modeling of Sinogram Neighborhoods.
Article in IEEE transactions on computational imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- SEA-Net: Structure-Enhanced Attention Network for Limited-Angle CBCT Reconstruction of Clinical Projection Data.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2023Article
- Autoregression and Structured Low-Rank Modeling of Sinogram Neighborhoods.IEEE transactions on computational imaging · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sinograms are commonly used to represent the raw data from tomographic imaging experiments. Although it is already well-known that sinograms posess some amount of redundancy, in this work, we present novel theory suggesting that sinograms will often possess substantial additional redundancies that have not been explicitly exploited by previous methods. Specifically, we derive that sinograms will often satisfy multiple simple data-dependent autoregression relationships. This kind of autoregressive structure enables missing/degraded sinogram samples to be linearly predicted using a simple shift-invariant linear combination of neighboring samples. Our theory also further implies that if sinogram samples are assembled into a structured Hankel/Toeplitz matrix, then the matrix will be expected to have low-rank characteristics. As a result, sinogram restoration problems can be formulated as structured low-rank matrix recovery problems. Illustrations of this approach are provided using several different (real and simulated) X-ray imaging datasets, including comparisons against a state-of-the-art deep learning approach. Results suggest that structured low-rank matrix methods for sinogram recovery can have comparable performance to state-of-the-art approaches. Although our evaluation focuses on competitive comparisons against other approaches, we believe that autoregressive constraints are actually complementary to existing approaches with strong potential synergies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.