Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059417›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2021

Choroidal Morphologic and Vascular Features in Patients With Myopic Choroidal Neovascularization and Different Levels of Myopia Based on Image Binarization of Optical Coherence Tomography.

Xinglin Wang, Jiarui Yang, Yushi Liu, Luling Yang, Huaqin Xia, Xiaotong Ren, Qingyi Hou, Yimeng Ge, Changguan Wang, Xuemin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of Optical Coherence Tomography Scan Pattern and Chorio-Scleral Interface Delineation on Choroidal Vascularity Index Measurements.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Strong association between decreased stroma in Sattler's layer and high myopia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinglin WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiarui YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yushi LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Luling YangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huaqin XiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaotong RenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qingyi HouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yimeng GeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Changguan WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuemin LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

choroidal structurechoroidal vascularity index (CVI)high myopiamyopic choroidal neovascularization (mCNV)optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID35059417
PMCPMC8764308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.