ReviewResearch and reports in urology2022
Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Refractory Ischaemic Priapism: Patient Selection and Special Considerations.
Review in Research and reports in urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current evidence on the management of ischaemic priapism post-shunting: a narrative review.International journal of impotence research · 2026Review
- Management of Prolonged Ischemic Priapism: A Case Series and Critical Analysis of Early Penile Prosthesis Implantation.Case reports in urology · 2026Article
- Nursing care for a patient with post-penile prosthesis implantation infection: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Penile implants in low flow priapism.International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Recent advances in understanding and treating priapism.Faculty reviews · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ischemic priapism accounts for more than 95% of all priapic episodes. It has to be considered a urological emergency because its time extension may lead to necrosis of smooth muscle cells of the corpora cavernosa, resulting in a complete erectile dysfunction, penile shortening and loss of girth. In the present systematic review, we perform an up-to-date literature search for patients suffering from refractory ischemic priapism who undergo penile prosthesis implantation with particular interests to the patients characteristics. The conservative management of the priapic episode consists of a sympathomimetic agent in the first istance. Failure or recurrence of priapism following these conservative measures is an indication for surgical management. Shunt procedures between the corpora cavernosa and the neighbouring structures are often used first line; however, in refractory ischemic priapism the success rate is minimal. In such cases (>48 h) an indication of immediate placement of a penile prosthesis could be the best solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.