Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059316›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021

Non-Invasive Preoperative Imaging Differential Diagnosis of Intracranial Hemangiopericytoma and Angiomatous Meningioma: A Novel Developed and Validated Multiparametric MRI-Based Clini-Radiomic Model.

Yanghua Fan, Panpan Liu, Yiping Li, Feng Liu, Yu He, Liang Wang, Junting Zhang, Zhen Wu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yanghua FanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Panpan LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yiping LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Weihai Municipal Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Weihai, China.
Feng LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Jiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital, The Affiliated Children's Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yu HeDepartment of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Liang WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Junting ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhen WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital · CNShandong University · CNCapital Medical University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNJiangxi Provincial Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate preoperative differentiation of intracranial hemangiopericytoma and angiomatous meningioma can greatly assist operation plan making and prognosis prediction. In this study, a clini-radiomic model combining radiomic and clinical features was used to distinguish intracranial hemangiopericytoma and hemangioma meningioma preoperatively.

methodsA total of 147 patients with intracranial hemangiopericytoma and 73 patients with angiomatous meningioma from the Tiantan Hospital were retrospectively reviewed and randomly assigned to training and validation sets. Radiomic features were extracted from MR images, the elastic net and recursive feature elimination algorithms were applied to select radiomic features for constructing a fusion radiomic model. Subsequently, multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to construct a clinical model, then a clini-radiomic model incorporating the fusion radiomic model and clinical features was constructed for individual predictions. The calibration, discriminating capacity, and clinical usefulness were also evaluated.

resultsSix significant radiomic features were selected to construct a fusion radiomic model that achieved an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.900 and 0.900 in the training and validation sets, respectively. A clini-radiomic model that incorporated the radiomic model and clinical features was constructed and showed good discrimination and calibration, with an AUC of 0.920 in the training set and 0.910 in the validation set. The analysis of the decision curve showed that the fusion radiomic model and clini-radiomic model were clinically useful.

conclusionsOur clini-radiomic model showed great performance and high sensitivity in the differential diagnosis of intracranial hemangiopericytoma and angiomatous meningioma, and could contribute to non-invasive development of individualized diagnosis and treatment for these patients.

Indexed as

algorithmangiomatous meningiomadiagnosisintracranial hemangiopericytomaradiomics

Identifiers

PMID35059316
PMCPMC8763962
OpenAlexW4206613713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.