ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Construction and Validation of a Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model for Non-Smokers in China.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk prediction for lung cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-regression.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- Prediction models for early detection and diagnosis of lung cancer in people who have never smoked: a systematic review and critical appraisal.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Pooled it
- Equity gaps in pulmonary nodule risk prediction for never-smokers: a real-world evidence-informed narrative review and policy analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- East-West Disparities in Lung Cancer Screening: Subsolid Nodule Prevalence, Interval Growth, and Decision-Making Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Lung cancer screening for never smokers: current evidence and future directions.Singapore medical journal · 2026Review
- The probability of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules detected via low-dose computed tomography screening in China.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Construction of a novel disulfidptosis-associated lncRNAs signature for risk features and immunotherapy in breast cancer.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of risk model-based lung cancer screening in smokers and nonsmokers in China.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Cost-effectiveness of low-dose CT screening for non-smokers with a first-degree relative history of lung cancer.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a risk stratification model based on Lung-RADSInsights into imaging · 2025Article
- Ensemble machine learning models for lung cancer incidence risk prediction in the elderly: a retrospective longitudinal study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Lung cancer risk score for ever and never smokers in China.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2023Article
- Screening Intention Prediction of Colorectal Cancer among Urban Chinese Based on the Protection Motivation Theory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Effectiveness of Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation Combined with Enteral Nutrition in the Treatment of Patients with Combined Respiratory Failure after Lung Cancer Surgery and Its Effect on Blood Gas Indexes.Emergency medicine international · 2022Article
- The association between outdoor air pollution and lung cancer risk in seven eastern metropolises of China: Trends in 2006-2014 and sex differences.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAbout 15% of lung cancers in men and 53% in women are not attributable to smoking worldwide. The aim was to develop and validate a simple and non-invasive model which could assess and stratify lung cancer risk in non-smokers in China.
methodsA large-sample size, population-based study was conducted under the framework of the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China (CanSPUC). Data on the lung cancer screening in Henan province, China, from October 2013 to October 2019 were used and randomly divided into the training and validation sets. Related risk factors were identified through multivariable Cox regression analysis, followed by establishment of risk prediction nomogram. Discrimination [area under the curve (AUC)] and calibration were further performed to assess the validation of risk prediction nomogram in the training set, and then validated by the validation set.
resultsA total of 214,764 eligible subjects were included, with a mean age of 55.19 years. Subjects were randomly divided into the training (107,382) and validation (107,382) sets. Elder age, being male, a low education level, family history of lung cancer, history of tuberculosis, and without a history of hyperlipidemia were the independent risk factors for lung cancer. Using these six variables, we plotted 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year lung cancer risk prediction nomogram. The AUC was 0.753, 0.752, and 0.755 for the 1-, 3- and 5-year lung cancer risk in the training set, respectively. In the validation set, the model showed a moderate predictive discrimination, with the AUC was 0.668, 0.678, and 0.685 for the 1-, 3- and 5-year lung cancer risk.
conclusionsWe developed and validated a simple and non-invasive lung cancer risk model in non-smokers. This model can be applied to identify and triage patients at high risk for developing lung cancers in non-smokers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.