Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059275›Full record

ReviewBeilstein journal of nanotechnology2022

Sputtering onto liquids: a critical review.

Anastasiya Sergievskaya, Adrien Chauvin, Stephanos Konstantinidis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Au Nanoparticle Synthesis in the Presence of Thiolated Hyaluronic Acid.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Time-resolvedNanoscale advances · 2023
    Article
  9. Confined Silver Nanoparticles in Ionic Liquid Films.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anastasiya Sergievskaya *Plasma-Surface Interaction Chemistry (ChIPS), University of Mons, 23 Place du Parc, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9589-9546
Adrien Chauvin *Plasma-Surface Interaction Chemistry (ChIPS), University of Mons, 23 Place du Parc, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1896-8776
Stephanos Konstantinidis *Plasma-Surface Interaction Chemistry (ChIPS), University of Mons, 23 Place du Parc, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1672-309X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sputter deposition of atoms onto liquid substrates aims at producing colloidal dispersions of small monodisperse ultrapure nanoparticles (NPs). Since sputtering onto liquids combines the advantages of the physical vapor deposition technique and classical colloidal synthesis, the review contains chapters explaining the basics of (magnetron) sputter deposition and the formation of NPs in solution. This review article covers more than 132 papers published on this topic from 1996 to September 2021 and aims at providing a critical analysis of most of the reported data; we will address the influence of the sputtering parameters (sputter power, current, voltage, sputter time, working gas pressure, and the type of sputtering plasma) and host liquid properties (composition, temperature, viscosity, and surface tension) on the NP formation as well as a detailed overview of the properties and applications of the produced NPs.

Indexed as

low-pressure plasmasmagnetronnanoparticle formationnanoparticlessputteringsputtering onto liquids

Identifiers

PMID35059275
PMCPMC8744456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.