ReviewBiophysical reviews2021
Acoustic cavitation-induced shear: a mini-review.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Emerging role of ultrasound in food technology: principles, applications, and future prospects.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Review
- Mechanozyme: An Artificial Enzyme With a Mechanophore Framework.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-Activated Bifunctional Piezoelectric Hydrogel Dressings Promote Infected Wound Healing via Regulating Angiogenesis and Lymphangiogenesis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Composition Descriptors and Cultivar Transferability in Machine-Learning Models of Ultrasonication-Induced Functional Properties of Rice Flour.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Physicochemical and Functional Properties of Type B Gelatin Obtained from Nile Tilapia (Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Effect of Ultrasonic Condensation Time on Void Formation and Microhardness of Well-RootMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ultrasonic disruption of circulating amyloid β aggregates via phase-change peptide nanoemulsions.Biomaterials · 2025Article
- Ultrasound mechanisms and their effect on solid synthesis and processing: a review.Chemical Society reviews · 2025Review
- Article
- Advances on sonophotocatalysis as a water and wastewater treatment technique: efficiency, challenges and process optimisation.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acoustic cavitation (or the formation of bubbles using acoustic or ultrasound-based devices) has been extensively exploited for biological applications in the form of bioprocessing and drug delivery/uptake. However, the governing parameters behind the several physical effects induced by cavitation are generally lacking in quantity in terms of suitable operating parameters of ultrasonic units. This review elaborates the current gaps in this realm and summarizes suitable investigative tools to explore the shear generated during cavitation. The underlying physics behind these events are also discussed. Furthermore, current advances of acoustic shear on biological specimens as well as future prospects of this cavitation-induced shear are also described.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.