Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059036›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2021

Human disease biomarker panels through systems biology.

Bradley J Smith, Licia C Silva-Costa, Daniel Martins-de-Souza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bradley J SmithLaboratory of Neuroproteomics, Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.
Licia C Silva-CostaLaboratory of Neuroproteomics, Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0292-4568
Daniel Martins-de-SouzaLaboratory of Neuroproteomics, Department of Biochemistry and Tissue Biology, Institute of Biology, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Campinas, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3595-5846

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As more uses for biomarkers are sought after for an increasing number of disease targets, single-target biomarkers are slowly giving way for biomarker panels. These panels incorporate various sources of biomolecular and clinical data to guarantee a higher robustness and power of separation for a clinical test. Multifactorial diseases such as psychiatric disorders show great potential for clinical use, assisting medical professionals during the analysis of risk and predisposition, disease diagnosis and prognosis, and treatment applicability and efficacy. More specific tests are also being developed to assist in ruling out, distinguishing between, and confirming suspicions of multifactorial diseases, as well as to predict which therapy option may be the best option for a given patient's biochemical profile. As more complex datasets are entering the field, involving multi-omic approaches, systems biology has stepped in to facilitate the discovery and validation steps during biomarker panel generation. Filtering biomolecules and clinical data, pre-validating and cross-validating potential biomarkers, generating final biomarker panels, and testing the robustness and applicability of those panels are all beginning to rely on machine learning and systems biology and research in this area will only benefit from advances in these approaches.

Indexed as

BioinformaticsBiomarker panelsBiomarkersPost-translational modificationsProteomics

Identifiers

PMID35059036
PMCPMC8724340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.