ReviewBiophysical reviews2021
Protein conformational dynamics and phenotypic switching.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the chaos: How architecture structures tumour biology.The FEBS journal · 2026Review
- Transition between cell states of sensitivity reveals molecular vulnerability of drug-tolerant cells.Molecular systems biology · 2025Article
- Energy Landscapes and Structural Plasticity of Intrinsically Disordered Histones.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Use of AI-methods over MD simulations in the sampling of conformational ensembles in IDPs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Phenotypic Plasticity, Non-genetic Mechanisms, and Immune Drug Resistance in Cancer.Cancer treatment and research · 2025Review
- Leveraging Cancer Phenotypic Plasticity for Novel Treatment Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- A Nexus between Genetic and Non-Genetic Mechanisms Guides KRAS Inhibitor Resistance in Lung Cancer.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Clinical Network Systems Biology: Traversing the Cancer Multiverse.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Addressing Drug Resistance in Cancer: A Team Medicine Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Editors' Roundup: June 2022.Biophysical reviews · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are proteins that lack rigid 3D structure but exist as conformational ensembles. Because of their structural plasticity, they can interact with multiple partners. The protein interactions between IDPs and their partners form scale-free protein interaction networks (PINs) that facilitate information flow in the cell. Because of their plasticity, IDPs typically occupy hub positions in cellular PINs. Furthermore, their conformational dynamics and propensity for post-translational modifications contribute to "conformational" noise which is distinct from the well-recognized transcriptional noise. Therefore, upregulation of IDPs in response to a specific input, such as stress, contributes to increased noise and, hence, an increase in stochastic, "promiscuous" interactions. These interactions lead to activation of latent pathways or can induce "rewiring" of the PIN to yield an optimal output underscoring the critical role of IDPs in regulating information flow. We have used PAGE4, a highly intrinsically disordered stress-response protein as a paradigm. Employing a variety of experimental and computational techniques, we have elucidated the role of PAGE4 in phenotypic switching of prostate cancer cells at a systems level. These cumulative studies over the past decade provide a conceptual framework to better understand how IDP conformational dynamics and conformational noise might facilitate cellular decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.