ReviewBiophysical reviews2021
Fluorescence nanoscopy at the sub-10 nm scale.
Review in Biophysical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanorulers for Super-Resolution Microscopy.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
- Molecular mapping in DNA-PAINT via modified Gaussian Mixture Modeling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Open-source sub-nanometer stabilization system for super-resolution fluorescence microscopy.Light, science & applications · 2025Article
- Spatial and stoichiometric in situ analysis of biomolecular oligomerization at single-protein resolution.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- An alternative to MINFLUX that enables nanometer resolution in a confocal microscope.Light, science & applications · 2022Article
- A common framework for single-molecule localization using sequential structured illumination.Biophysical reports · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescence nanoscopy represented a breakthrough for the life sciences as it delivers 20-30 nm resolution using far-field fluorescence microscopes. This resolution limit is not fundamental but imposed by the limited photostability of fluorophores under ambient conditions. This has motivated the development of a second generation of fluorescence nanoscopy methods that aim to deliver sub-10 nm resolution, reaching the typical size of structural proteins and thus providing true molecular resolution. In this review, we present common fundamental aspects of these nanoscopies, discuss the key experimental factors that are necessary to fully exploit their capabilities, and discuss their current and future challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.