Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35059012›Full record

ArticleBiophysical reviews2021

Protein folding, misfolding, and un/non-folding: overview of the SP16 Session at the 20

Vladimir N Uversky

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biophysical reviews · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vladimir N UverskyDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Byrd Alzheimer's Research Institute, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 12901 Bruce B. Downs Blvd, Tampa, FL MDC07 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4037-5857
University of South Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The classical and idealistic consideration of the protein universe as a set of well-ordered proteinaceous machines with unique spatial organizations conducting unique biological functions is changed because of the recognition that proteins can fold, misfold, or be disordered to different degree. Functional repertoires of intrinsically disordered proteins complement functions of ordered proteins, whereas protein misfolding and concomitant oligomerization, aggregation, and fibrillation are related to the pathogenesis of numerous human diseases. Flexible proteins can undergo liquid-liquid phase separation, which is at the heart of the biogenesis of numerous membrane-less organelles. Many of these aspects were highlighted in four talks delivered at the SP16 Session at the 20th IUPAB congress, 45th Annual Meeting of SBBf, and 50th Annual Meeting of SBBq.

Identifiers

PMID35059012
PMCPMC8724331
OpenAlexW3214583044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.