ArticleFrontiers in genetics2021
Residue-Residue Contact Can Be a Potential Feature for the Prediction of Lysine Crotonylation Sites.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Freeprotmap: waiting-free prediction method for protein distance map.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Interpretable Multi-Scale Deep Learning for RNA Methylation Analysis across Multiple Species.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lysine crotonylation (Kcr) is involved in plenty of activities in the human body. Various technologies have been developed for Kcr prediction. Sequence-based features are typically adopted in existing methods, in which only linearly neighboring amino acid composition was considered. However, modified Kcr sites are neighbored by not only the linear-neighboring amino acid but also those spatially surrounding residues around the target site. In this paper, we have used residue-residue contact as a new feature for Kcr prediction, in which features encoded with not only linearly surrounding residues but also those spatially nearby the target site. Then, the spatial-surrounding residue was used as a new scheme for feature encoding for the first time, named residue-residue composition (RRC) and residue-residue pair composition (RRPC), which were used in supervised learning classification for Kcr prediction. As the result suggests, RRC and RRPC have achieved the best performance of RRC at an accuracy of 0.77 and an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.78, RRPC at an accuracy of 0.74, and an AUC value of 0.80. In order to show that the spatial feature is of a competitively high significance as other sequence-based features, feature selection was carried on those sequence-based features together with feature RRPC. In addition, different ranges of the surrounding amino acid compositions' radii were used for comparison of the performance. After result assessment, RRC and RRPC features have shown competitively outstanding performance as others or in some cases even around 0.20 higher in accuracy or 0.3 higher in AUC values compared with sequence-based features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.