Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35058723›Full record

ReviewJournal of ginseng research2022

Ginseng extract and ginsenosides improve neurological function and promote antioxidant effects in rats with spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Kim Sia Sng, Gan Li, Long-Yun Zhou, Yong-Jia Song, Xu-Qing Chen, Yong-Jun Wang, Min Yao, Xue-Jun Cui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ginseng research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Ginsenosides Rb3 and Rc Exhibit Anti-Amoebic Activities AgainstPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. CanJournal of ginseng research · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kim Sia SngInstitute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Gan LiInstitute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Long-Yun ZhouRehabilitation Medicine Center, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, Jiangsu, China.
Yong-Jia SongInstitute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xu-Qing ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China.
Yong-Jun WangInstitute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Min YaoInstitute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xue-Jun CuiInstitute of Spine Disease, Longhua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNJiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNNanjing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is defined as damage to the spinal cord that temporarily or permanently changes its function. There is no definite treatment established for neurological complete injury patients. This study investigated the effect of ginseng extract and ginsenosides on neurological recovery and antioxidant efficacies in rat models following SCI and explore the appropriate dosage. Searches were done on PubMed, Embase, and Chinese databases, and animal studies matches the inclusion criteria were selected. Pair-wise meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were performed. Ten studies were included, and the overall methodological qualities were low quality. The result showed ginseng extract and ginsenosides significantly improve neurological function, through the Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating scale (pooled MD = 4.40; 95% CI = 3.92 to 4.88; p < 0.00001), significantly decrease malondialdehyde (MDA) (n = 290; pooled MD = -2.19; 95% CI = -3.16 to -1.22; p < 0.0001) and increase superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels (n = 290; pooled MD = 2.14; 95% CI = 1.45 to 2.83; p < 0.00001). Both low (<25 mg/kg) and high dosage (≥25 mg/kg) showed significant improvement in the motor function recovery in SCI rats. Collectively, this review suggests ginseng extract and ginsenosides has a protective effect on SCI, with good safety and a clear mechanism of action and may be suitable for future clinical trials and applications.

Indexed as

Ginseng extractGinsenosidesMeta-analysisSpinal cord injurySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35058723
PMCPMC8753526
OpenAlexW3177432340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.