Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35058690›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Does the Efficacy of High Intensity Ventilation in Stable COPD Depend on the Ventilator Model? A Bench-to-Bedside Study.

Cristina Lalmolda, Pablo Flórez, Marta Corral, Ana Hernández Voth, Carles Grimau, Javier Sayas, Manel Luján

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03373175 (Influence of Ventilator Model and Pressure Support Level in Muscular Unloading in COPD Patients With Non Invasive Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03373175 nacompletednot on this map

Influence of Ventilator Model and Pressure Support Level in Muscular Unloading in COPD Patients With Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCorporacion Parc TauliRan2017 to 2021Enrolled10ConditionsCOPDArmsBasal record, PS 10 record, PS 15 record, PS 20 record
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ventilators, Settings, Autotitration Algorithms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina LalmoldaPneumology Department, Corporació Sanitària I Universitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1128-9028
Pablo FlórezPneumology Department, Corporació Sanitària I Universitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta CorralPneumology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Hernández VothPneumology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Carles GrimauPneumology Department, Corporació Sanitària I Universitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Javier SayasCIBERES, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en red, Mallorca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2399-4370
Manel LujánPneumology Department, Corporació Sanitària I Universitària Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias · ESCorporació Sanitària Parc Taulí · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe European Task Force for chronic non-invasive ventilation in stable COPD recommends the use of high pressure-support (PS) level to maximize the decrease in PaCO2. It is possible that the ventilator model can influence the need for higher or lower pressure levels. RESEARCH QUESTION: To determine the differences between ventilators in a bench model with an increased inspiratory demand; and to compare the degree of muscular unloading measured by parasternal electromyogram (EMGpara) provided by the different ventilators in real patients with stable COPD. PATIENTS AND

methodsBench: four levels of increasing progressive effort were programmed. The response of nine ventilators to four levels of PS and EPAP of 5 cm H2O was studied. The pressure-time product was determined at 300 and 500 msec (PTP 300/500). CLINICAL STUDY: The ventilators were divided into two groups, based on the result of the bench test. Severe COPD patients with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) were studied, randomly comparing the performance of one ventilator from each group. Muscle unloading was measured by the decrease in EMGpara from its baseline value.

resultsThere were significant differences in PTP 300 and PTP 500 in the bench study. Based on these results, home ventilators were classified into two groups; group 1 included four models with higher PTP 300. Ten COPD patients were recruited for the clinical study. Group 1 ventilators showed greater muscle unloading at the same PS than group 2.

conclusionThe scale of pressure support in NIV for high intensity ventilation may be influenced by the ventilator model. CLINICAL TRIALSGOV: NCT03373175.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansPositive-Pressure RespirationRespirationRespiration, ArtificialVentilators, Mechanicalchronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseparasternal electromyogrampressure supportpressure-time productrespiratory muscle unloadingrise time

Identifiers

PMID35058690
PMCPMC8765713
OpenAlexW4205380785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.