Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35058669›Full record

ArticleComputational statistics & data analysis2022

Spatial Two-stage Designs for Phase II Clinical Trials.

Seongho Kim, Weng Kee Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational statistics & data analysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seongho KimBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Core, Karmanos Cancer Institute/Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201.
Weng Kee WongDepartment of Biostatistics, UCLA School of Public Health, Los Angeles, CA 90095.

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
Designing Efficient Designs under Model Uncertainty for Biological StudiesR01GM107639 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI WONG, WENG K · 2014 to 2017
$1.0M
MS-based metabolite identificationR21GM140352 · NIGMS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, SEONGHO · 2021 to 2022
$438k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107639NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM140352
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A common endpoint in a single-arm phase II study is tumor response as a binary variable. Two widely used designs for such a study are Simon's two-stage minimax and optimal designs. The minimax design minimizes the maximal sample size and the optimal design minimizes the expected sample size under the null hypothesis. The optimal design generally has the larger total sample size than the minimax design, but its first stage's sample size is smaller than that of the minimax design. The difference in the total sample size between two types of designs can be large and so both designs can be unappealing to investigators. We develop novel designs that compromise on the two optimality criteria and avoid such occurrences using the spatial information on the first stage's required sample size and the total required sample size. We study properties of these spatial designs and show our proposed designs have advantages over Simon's designs and one of its extensions by Lin and Shih. As applications, we construct spatial designs for real-life studies on patients with Hodgkin disease and another study on effect of head and neck cancer on apnea.

Indexed as

adaptive designLin and Shih’s designSimon’s designspatial design

Identifiers

PMID35058669
PMCPMC8765730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.