Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35058487›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A review of some techniques for inclusion of domain-knowledge into deep neural networks.

Tirtharaj Dash, Sharad Chitlangia, Aditya Ahuja, Ashwin Srinivasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tirtharaj DashDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Anuradha and Prashanth Palakurthi Centre for AI Research (APPCAIR), BITS Pilani, K.K. Birla Goa Campus, Goa, 403726, India. tirtharaj@goa.bits-pilani.ac.in.
Sharad ChitlangiaDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Anuradha and Prashanth Palakurthi Centre for AI Research (APPCAIR), BITS Pilani, K.K. Birla Goa Campus, Goa, 403726, India.
Aditya AhujaDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Anuradha and Prashanth Palakurthi Centre for AI Research (APPCAIR), BITS Pilani, K.K. Birla Goa Campus, Goa, 403726, India.
Ashwin SrinivasanDepartment of Computer Science and Information Systems, Anuradha and Prashanth Palakurthi Centre for AI Research (APPCAIR), BITS Pilani, K.K. Birla Goa Campus, Goa, 403726, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a survey of ways in which existing scientific knowledge are included when constructing models with neural networks. The inclusion of domain-knowledge is of special interest not just to constructing scientific assistants, but also, many other areas that involve understanding data using human-machine collaboration. In many such instances, machine-based model construction may benefit significantly from being provided with human-knowledge of the domain encoded in a sufficiently precise form. This paper examines the inclusion of domain-knowledge by means of changes to: the input, the loss-function, and the architecture of deep networks. The categorisation is for ease of exposition: in practice we expect a combination of such changes will be employed. In each category, we describe techniques that have been shown to yield significant changes in the performance of deep neural networks.

Identifiers

PMID35058487
PMCPMC8776800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.