Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35058304›Full record

SynthesisBMJ global health2022

Enhancing quality midwifery care in humanitarian and fragile settings: a systematic review of interventions, support systems and enabling environments.

Caroline Se Homer, Sabera Turkmani, Alyce N Wilson, Joshua P Vogel, Mehr Gul Shah, Helga Fogstad, Etienne V Langlois

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline Se HomerMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Caroline.homer@burnet.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-7454-3011
Sabera TurkmaniMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Alyce N WilsonMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Joshua P VogelMaternal, Child and Adolescent Health Program, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mehr Gul ShahPartnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.
Helga FogstadPartnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.
Etienne V LangloisPartnership for Maternal, Newborn & Child Health (PMNCH), World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4853-2511

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWomen and children bear a substantial burden of the impact of conflict and instability. The number of people living in humanitarian and fragile settings (HFS) has increased significantly over the last decade. The provision of essential maternal and newborn healthcare by midwives is crucial everywhere, especially in HFS. There is limited knowledge about the interventions, support systems and enabling environments that enhance midwifery care in these settings. The aim of this paper is to identify the factors affecting an enabling environment for midwives in HFS and to explore the availability and effectiveness of support systems for midwives.

methodsA structured systematic review was undertaken to identify peer-reviewed primary research articles published between 1995 and 2020.

resultsIn total, 24 papers were included from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, South Sudan and Sudan, Ethiopia, Pakistan, Uganda and Liberia. There were two broad themes: (1) the facilitators of, and barriers to, an enabling environment, and (2) the importance of effective support systems for midwives. Facilitators were: community involvement and engagement and an adequate salary, incentives or benefits. Barriers included: security and safety concerns, culture and gender norms and a lack of infrastructure and supplies. Support systems were: education, professional development, supportive supervision, mentorship and workforce planning.

conclusionMore efforts are needed to develop and implement quality midwifery services in HFS. There is an urgent need for more action and financing to ensure better outcomes and experiences for all women, girls and families living in these settings. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021226323.

Indexed as

MidwiferyAfghanistanBangladeshChildEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyQuality of Health Carematernal health

Identifiers

PMID35058304
PMCPMC8772423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.