Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35058269›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Patient experience of diagnosis and management of spontaneous intracranial hypotension: a cross-sectional online survey.

Sanjay Cheema, Clare Joy, Jenny Pople, Jessica Snape-Burns, Tamsin Trevarthen, Manjit Matharu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06711731 (The Freiburg Registry on SpontanEous IntercrAnial Hypotension), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06711731 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Freiburg Registry on SpontanEous IntercrAnial Hypotension (SIH) & Post-duraL Puncture Headache (PDPH)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital FreiburgRan2024 to 2036Enrolled2,000ConditionsCerebroSpinal Fluid (CSF) Leak
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension.Practical neurology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sanjay CheemaHeadache and Facial Pain Group, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5438-6549
Clare JoyCSF Leak Association, Strathpeffer, Scotland, UK.
Jenny PopleCSF Leak Association, Strathpeffer, Scotland, UK.
Jessica Snape-BurnsCSF Leak Association, Strathpeffer, Scotland, UK.
Tamsin TrevarthenCSF Leak Association, Strathpeffer, Scotland, UK.
Manjit MatharuHeadache and Facial Pain Group, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK m.matharu@uclmail.net.ORCID 0000-0002-4960-2294
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo present the results of a survey of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) secondary to spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, documenting the patient experience of its diagnosis and management as well as quantifying its impact on quality of life.

designA cross-sectional anonymous online survey was designed in conjunction with the CSF Leak Association patient charity. The survey included questions on diagnosis, investigations and treatments received, as well as validated disability and quality of life questionnaires.

participantsSixty-four patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SIH who were receiving treatment within the UK were included in the analysis. The mean age was 42.8 years, 94% were female and 43 had ongoing symptoms of SIH.

resultsPatients who presented to their general practitioner with symptoms of SIH were seen an average three times before being referred to a specialist, and in just under half of patients, the diagnosis was not made by the first specialist they saw. There was variability in which investigations were performed and how urgently they were organised. The mean EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) Visual Analogue Scale score was 36.4/100 and median Headache Impact Test-6 score was 68/78 (very severe impact). More than half of the respondents reported that they had to amend work duties due to SIH, more than a quarter reported that they had lost their job and two-thirds reported that their condition had affected their financial health. Only 23.4% of patients felt that they had received enough help and advice to manage their pain due to SIH.

conclusionsSIH is a highly disabling disorder, affecting multiple domains, including pain, mobility, activities of daily living, financial circumstances and employment. Diagnostic delay and misdiagnosis are common, and currently there is a lack of consistency in the investigation and management of SIH in the UK.

Indexed as

Intracranial HypotensionActivities of Daily LivingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPatient Outcome AssessmentQuality of Lifeneurologyneuroradiologyneurosurgerypain management

Identifiers

PMID35058269
PMCPMC8783814
OpenAlexW4205803634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.