Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35058268›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2022

How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review.

Nathalie Baungaard, Pia Ladeby Skovvang, Elisabeth Assing Hvidt, Helle Gerbild, Merethe Kirstine Andersen, Jesper Lykkegaard

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06500832 (An Analysis of Clinicians' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Defensive Dentistry Practices), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06500832 completednot on this map

An Analysis of Clinicians' Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Defensive Dentistry Practices: A Survey-based Research

TypeobservationalSponsorIstanbul Aydın UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled410ConditionsDefensive MedicineArmsSurvey-based Data Collection Tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Defensive medicine in dermatological practice - Dermatopathology as a mirror of structural challenges.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Review
  14. Examining the role of psychiatrists in involuntary admissions under the Mental Health Act in New Zealand.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nathalie BaungaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark nathaliebaungaard@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7311-2116
Pia Ladeby SkovvangResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Elisabeth Assing HvidtResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3762-8478
Helle GerbildHealth Sciences Research Centre, UCL University College, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0699-4264
Merethe Kirstine AndersenResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4833-1867
Jesper LykkegaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9128-6136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDefensive medicine has originally been defined as motivated by fear of malpractice litigation. However, the term is frequently used in Europe where most countries have a no-fault malpractice system. The objectives of this systematic review were to explore the definition of the term 'defensive medicine' in European original medical literature and to identify the motives stated therein.

designSystematic review. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase and Cochrane, 3 February 2020, with an updated search on 6 March 2021.

methodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, we reviewed all European original peer-reviewed studies fully or partially investigating 'defensive medicine'.

resultsWe identified a total of 50 studies. First, we divided these into two categories: the first category consisting of studies defining defensive medicine by using a narrow definition and the second category comprising studies in which defensive medicine was defined using a broad definition. In 23 of the studies(46%), defensive medicine was defined narrowly as: health professionals' deviation from sound medical practice motivated by a wish to reduce exposure to malpractice litigation. In 27 studies (54%), a broad definition was applied adding … or other self-protective motives. These self-protective motives, different from fear of malpractice litigation, were grouped into four categories: fear of patient dissatisfaction, fear of overlooking a severe diagnosis, fear of negative publicity and unconscious defensive medicine. Studies applying the narrow and broad definitions of defensive medicine did not differ regarding publication year, country, medical specialty, research quality or number of citations.

conclusionsIn European research, the narrow definition of defensive medicine as exclusively motivated by fear of litigation is often broadened to include other self-protective motives. In order to compare results pertaining to defensive medicine across countries, future studies are recommended to specify whether they are using the narrow or broad definition of defensive medicine. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020167215.

Indexed as

MalpracticeMedicineDefensive MedicineEuropeHumansclinical auditclinical governancehealth economicshealth services administration & managementmedical lawquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35058268
PMCPMC8783809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.