ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2022
Using Participatory Design to Engage Physicians in the Development of a Provider-Level Performance Dashboard and Feedback System.
Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Methods used to design audit and feedback interventions to change clinical practice: a scoping review.Frontiers in health services · 2026Pooled it
- The integration of quality improvement and implementation science methods and frameworks in healthcare: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- From predefined indicators to a management dashboard for heart failure telemonitoring: a modified nominal group technique approach in Portuguese hospitals.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- "Be Really Careful about That": Clinicians' Perceptions of an Intelligence Augmentation Tool for In-Hospital Deterioration Detection.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Towards a Novel Patient Experience Survey System: Incorporating Physician Perspectives into Performance Feedback Dashboard Design.Journal of patient experience · 2025Article
- Pneumonia diagnosis performance in the emergency department: a mixed-methods study about clinicians' experiences and exploration of individual differences and response to diagnostic performance feedback.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Individualized average length of stay: A timelier, provider-level LOS metric.Journal of hospital medicine · 2024Article
- Electronic Co-design (ECO-design) Workshop for Increasing Clinician Participation in the Design of Health Services Interventions: Participatory Design Approach.JMIR human factors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
problem definitionPerformance feedback, in which clinicians are given data on select metrics, is widely used in the context of quality improvement. However, there is a lack of practical guidance describing the process of developing performance feedback systems. INITIAL APPROACH: This study took place at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) with hospitalist physicians. Participatory design methodology was used to develop a performance dashboard and feedback system. Twenty hospitalist physicians participated in a series of six design sessions and two surveys. Each design session and survey systematically addressed key components of the feedback system, including design, metric selection, data delivery, and incentives. The Capability Opportunity Motivation and Behavior (COM-B) model was then used to identify behavior change interventions to facilitate engagement with the dashboard during a pilot implementation. KEY INSIGHTS, LESSONS LEARNED: In regard to performance improvement, physicians preferred collaboration over competition and internal motivation over external incentives. Physicians preferred that the dashboard be used as a tool to aid in clinical practice improvement and not punitively by leadership. Metrics that were clinical or patient-centered were perceived as more meaningful and more likely to motivate behavior change. NEXT STEPS: The performance dashboard has been introduced to the entire hospitalist group, and evaluation of implementation continues by monitoring engagement and physician attitudes. This will be followed by targeted feedback interventions to attempt to improve performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.