Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35058044›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2022

Hospitalizations up to 8 years following delivery in assisted reproductive technology-treated and subfertile women.

Leslie V Farland, Chia-Ling Liu, Hafsatou Diop, Howard J Cabral, Stacey A Missmer, Charles C Coddington, Sunah S Hwang, Judy E Stern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leslie V FarlandDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine-Tucson, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona. Electronic address: lfarland@email.arizona.edu.
Chia-Ling LiuMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hafsatou DiopMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Boston, Massachusetts.
Howard J CabralDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stacey A MissmerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Charles C CoddingtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center/Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Sunah S HwangDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Neonatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Judy E SternDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock, Lebanon, New Hampshire.

Funding

Women's Health After Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Population-Based StudyR01HD067270 · NICHD · DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK CLINIC · PI DIOP, HAFSATOU, STERN, JUDY E · 2011 to 2020
$7.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate hospitalizations up to 8 years after live birth among women who used assisted reproductive technology (ART) or who were subfertile compared with women who conceived naturally.

designRetrospective cohort.

settingDeliveries among privately insured women aged ≥18 years between 2004 and 2017 from Massachusetts state vital records were linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System and hospital observational/inpatient stays. PATIENT(S): We compared patients with ART, medically assisted reproduction (MAR), and unassisted subfertile (USF) delivery with those with fertile delivery. INTERVENTION(S): NA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Postdelivery hospitalization information was derived from the International Classification of Diseases codes for discharges and combined by type. The relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of hospitalization for up to the first 8 years postdelivery were modeled. RESULT(S): Among 492,515 deliveries, 5.6% used ART, 1.6% used MAR, and 1.8% were USF. Compared with fertile deliveries, deliveries that used ART or MAR or were USF were more likely to have hospital utilization (inpatient or observational stay) for any reason for up to 8 years of follow-up (USF, adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.12-1.25]; MAR, aRR, 1.20 [1.13-1.27]; and ART, aRR, 1.29 [1.25-1.34]). Assisted reproductive technology deliveries had an increased risk of hospitalization for conditions of the cardiovascular system (aRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.20-1.41]), overweight/obesity (aRR, 1.30 [1.17-1.44]), diabetes (aRR, 1.25 [1.05-1.49]), reproductive tract (aRR, 1.62 [1.47-1.79]), digestive tract (aRR, 1.39 [1.30-1.49]), thyroid (aRR, 2.02 [1.80-2.26]), respiratory system (aRR, 1.13 [1.03-1.24]), and cancer (aRR, 1.40 [1.18-1.65]) up to 8 years after delivery. Deliveries with MAR and subfertility had similar patterns of hospitalization as ART deliveries. CONCLUSION(S): Women who conceived through fertility treatment or experienced subfertility were at increased risk of subsequent hospitalization resulting from a variety of chronic and acute conditions.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHospitalizationHumansInfant, NewbornInfertility, FemaleMassachusettsPregnancyReproductive Techniques, AssistedRetrospective StudiesARTcancercardiovascular diseaseinfertilitysubfertility

Identifiers

PMID35058044
PMCPMC8885864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.