Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35057813›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2022

The distributional effects of tobacco tax increases across regions in Mexico: an extended cost-effectiveness analysis.

Belen Saenz-de-Miera, Daphne C Wu, Beverly M Essue, Norman Maldonado, Prabhat Jha, Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Belen Saenz-de-MieraDepartment of Economics, Universidad Autonoma de Baja California Sur, Carretera al Sur Km 5.5, 23080, La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico. b.saenzdm@uabcs.mx.ORCID 0000-0003-3117-0734
Daphne C WuCentre for Global Health Research, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Beverly M EssueCentre for Global Health Research, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Norman MaldonadoPROESA, Universidad Icesi, Cali, Colombia.
Prabhat JhaCentre for Global Health Research, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Luz Myriam Reynales-ShigematsuDepartamento de Investigacion sobre Tabaco, Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, Cuernavaca, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have shown the beneficial effects of tobacco fiscal policy, but distributional effects have been less examined, especially at the subnational level. The objective of this study is to analyse the distributional effects of a one-peso tobacco tax increase (roughly equivalent to tripling the current excise tax) on health, poverty, and financial outcomes at the subnational level in Mexico.

methodsWe employ an extended cost-effectiveness analysis that estimates life-years gained, smoking attributable deaths averted, treatment costs averted, number of persons avoiding poverty and catastrophic health expenditures, and additional tax revenues by income group across five regions.

resultsWith the one-peso tax increase (or 44% price increase), about 1.5 million smokers would quit smoking across the five regions, resulting in nearly 630 thousand premature deaths averted and 12.6 million life years gained. The bottom income quintile would gain three times more life years gains than the top quintile (ratio 3:1), and the largest gain for the most deprived would occur in the South (ratio 19:1), the region with the highest poverty incidence. Costs averted and additional tax revenues would reach 44.6 and 16.2 billion pesos, respectively. Moreover, 251 thousand individuals would avoid falling into poverty, including 53.2 in the lowest income quintile, and 563.9 thousand would avoid catastrophic health expenditures. Overall, the bottom income group would obtain 26% of the life years gained and 24% of the cost averted, while only paying 3% of the additional tax revenue.

conclusionsThe most significant gains from a substantial cigarette price increase would be for the poorest 20%, especially in the South, the most impoverished region of Mexico. Therefore, tobacco taxes are an opportunity for governments to advance in equity and towards the achievement of sustainable development goals on non-communicable diseases.

Indexed as

Tobacco ProductsCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMexicoTaxesDistributional effectsMexicoSubnationalTobacco taxation

Identifiers

PMID35057813
PMCPMC8772114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.