Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35057551›Full record

ArticleNutrients2022

Characterizing Individual Differences in Sweet Taste Hedonics: Test Methods, Locations, and Stimuli.

May M Cheung, Matthew Kramer, Gary K Beauchamp, Sari Puputti, Paul M Wise

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

May M CheungMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Matthew KramerBeltsville Agricultural Research Center, United States Department of Agriculture, 10300 Baltimore Ave., Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5393-9669
Gary K BeauchampMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Sari PuputtiFunctional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-0064
Paul M WiseMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING IN THE CHEMICAL SENSEST32DC000014 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI PAMELA HELEN DALTON, Joel D Mainland · 1989 to 2026
$6.2M
Monell Chemical Senses Center SNT001NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000014NIDCD NIH HHS T32DC000014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sweetness drives the consumption of added sugars, so understanding how to best measure sweet hedonics is important for developing strategies to lower sugar intake. However, methods to assess hedonic response to sweetness vary, making results across studies difficult to integrate. We compared methods to measure optimal sucrose concentration in 21 healthy adults (1) using paired-comparison preference tracking vs. ratings of liking, (2) with participants in the laboratory vs. at home, and (3) using aqueous solutions vs. vanilla milk. Tests were replicated on separate days to assess test-retest reliability. Test-retest reliability was similar between laboratory and home testing, but tended to be better for vanilla milk and preference tracking. Optimal sucrose concentration was virtually identical between laboratory and home, slightly lower when estimated via preference tracking, and about 50% lower in vanilla milk. However, optimal sucrose concentration correlated strongly between methods, locations, and stimuli. More than 50% of the variability in optimal sucrose concentration could be attributed to consistent differences among individuals, while much less variability was attributable to differences between methods. These results demonstrate convergent validity between methods, support testing at home, and suggest that aqueous solutions can be useful proxies for some commonly consumed beverages for measuring individual differences.

Indexed as

BeveragesFood PreferencesSweetening AgentsTasteAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansIndividualityMaleMiddle AgedMilkPhilosophyReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSucroseSucroseSweetening Agentshedonicshome-usage testingindividual differencesmethodologyremote testingsugarsweet taste

Identifiers

PMID35057551
PMCPMC8777740
OpenAlexW4226084055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.