Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35057531›Full record

ReviewNutrients2022

Nutritional Approach to Cancer Cachexia: A Proposal for Dietitians.

Kotone Tanaka, Sho Nakamura, Hiroto Narimatsu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Factors associated with multimodal care practices for cancer cachexia among registered dietitians.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kotone TanakaSchool of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health and Social Services, Kanagawa University of Human Services 1-10-1 Heiseicho, Yokosuka-shi 238-0013, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5274-7462
Sho NakamuraCancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5378-9477
Hiroto NarimatsuCancer Prevention and Control Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute 2-3-2 Nakao, Asahi-ku, Yokohama 241-8515, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0383-4911
Kanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPKanagawa University of Human Services · JP

Funding

Kanagawa University of Human Services 111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cachexia is one of the most common, related factors of malnutrition in cancer patients. Cancer cachexia is a multifactorial syndrome characterized by persistent loss of skeletal muscle mass and fat mass, resulting in irreversible and progressive functional impairment. The skeletal muscle loss cannot be reversed by conventional nutritional support, and a combination of anti-inflammatory agents and other nutrients is recommended. In this review, we reviewed the effects of nutrients that are expected to combat muscle loss caused by cancer cachexia (eicosapentaenoic acid, β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, creatine, and carnitine) to propose nutritional approaches that can be taken at present. Current evidence is based on the intake of nutrients as supplements; however, the long-term and continuous intake of nutrients as food has the potential to be useful for the body. Therefore, in addition to conventional nutritional support, we believe that it is important for the dietitian to work with the clinical team to first fully assess the patient's condition and then to safely incorporate nutrients that are expected to have specific functions for cancer cachexia from foods and supplements.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFunctional FoodCachexiaHumansNeoplasmsNutritional SupportNutritionistscachexiacancercarnitinecreatineEPAHMB

Identifiers

PMID35057531
PMCPMC8779386
OpenAlexW4205481325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.