Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35057522›Full record

SynthesisNutrients2022

The Impact of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics during Pregnancy or Lactation on the Intestinal Microbiota of Children Born by Cesarean Section: A Systematic Review.

Sandra Martín-Peláez, Naomi Cano-Ibáñez, Miguel Pinto-Gallardo, Carmen Amezcua-Prieto

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nutrients, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Effect ofNutrients · 2023
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra Martín-PeláezDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2193-3913
Naomi Cano-IbáñezDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3640-5486
Miguel Pinto-GallardoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.
Carmen Amezcua-PrietoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0957-4057
Universidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota is a key factor in the correct development of the gastrointestinal immune system. Studies have found differences between the gut microbiota of newborns delivered by cesarean section compared to those vaginally delivered. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of ingestion of probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics during pregnancy and/or lactation on the development of the gut microbiota of the C-section newborns. We selected experimental studies in online databases from their inception to October 2021. Of the 83 records screened, 12 met the inclusion criteria. The probiotics used belonged to the genera

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaBifidobacteriumBreast FeedingCesarean SectionEcosystemFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornLactationLactobacillusMalePrebioticsPregnancyPrenatal CareProbioticsPrebioticscesarean sectiongut microbiotaprebioticspregnancyprobioticssynbiotics

Identifiers

PMID35057522
PMCPMC8778982
OpenAlexW4205623186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.